Volume : 12, Issue : 4, APR 2026

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERACTIVE TEACHING STRATEGIES ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN GRADE 6

GLIEZA A. ASOY, MANILYN S. BALINGIT, JERAMY L. BRIONES, CATHERINE O. MEDRANO, DWEZEL JOY R. PARAME, MARILYN MIRANDA, ED.D., DPA

Abstract

This study focuses on how interactive teaching strategies can effectively improve student engagement among thirty Grade 6 learnersof South Poblacion Elementary School in San Fernando Cebu . Instead of relying on traditional lecture-based instruction, the research highlights methods such as collaborative learning, peer instruction, problem-based learning, and the use of technology in the classroom. These strategies encourage students to actively participate in their learning by working with peers, discussing ideas, solving real-world problems, and using digital tools. The study specifically examines three key dimensions of engagement: behavioral (students’ participation in activities), emotional (their interest and enthusiasm), and cognitive (their level of thinking and understanding). Based on existing literature, the findings show that when interactive strategies are properly implemented, students become more motivated, more involved in classroom tasks, and demonstrate improved academic performance. They also develop better communication and teamwork skills through collaboration. However, the study emphasizes that the success of these approaches depends largely on the teacher’s role in guiding activities, organizing structured lessons, and ensuring that all students are actively involved. Overall, the research concludes that interactive teaching strategies are highly effective in creating a more engaging and meaningful learning experience for Grade 6 students.

Keywords

INTERACTIVE TEACHING, STUDENT ENGAGEMENT, GRADE 6, COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, ACTIVE LEARNING.

Article : Download PDF

Cite This Article

IESRJ

International Educational Scientific Research Journal

E-ISSN: 2455-295X

International Indexed Journal | Multi-Disciplinary Refereed Research Journal

ISSN: 2455-295X

Peer-Reviewed Journal - Equivalent to UGC Approved Journal

Peer-Reviewed Journal

Article No : 26

Number of Downloads : 31

References

1. Lawal, A. A. (2025). Effectiveness of interactive teaching methods in improving student engagement with history and social studies. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 28(3), 2237–2246. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.3.4299

2. Li, J.-L. (2026). Interactive teaching strategies, instructional perception, and student engagement in communication courses: Empirical evidence from a non?Western context. Frontiers in Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1761617

3. Xu, Z., Zhou, X., Watts, J., & Kogut, A. (2023). The effect of student engagement strategies in online instruction for data management skills. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 10267–10284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11572-w

4. McCall, A. (2025). The impact of technology integration on student engagement and learning outcomes in secondary education [Manuscript]. Retrieved from ResearchGate.

5. Enhancing student engagement and outcomes: The effects of cooperative learning pedagogical design. (2024). Education Sciences, 14(9), 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090975

6. Aliyu, J., Osman, S., Kumar, J. A., Talib, C. A., & Jambari, H. (2024). Students’ engagement through technology and cooperative learning: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Learning and Development, 12(3), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v12i3.20051

7. Hasanov, Z., Antoniou, P., Suleymanov, E., & Garayev, V. (2021). The impact of behavioral, cognitive, and emotional dimensions of student engagement on student learning. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 14(10), 378–396.

8. Galatsopoulou, F., Kenterelidou, C., Kotsakis, R., & Matsiola, M. (2022). Students’ perceptions towards video?based active learning scenarios. Education Sciences, 12(2), 74.

9. Tight, M. (2020). Student retention and engagement in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(6), 689–704.

10. National Survey of Student Engagement. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved April 2026, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Survey_of_Student_Engagement