Volume : 12, Issue : 2, FEB 2026

REFLECTIVE TEACHING REVISITED: UNCOVERING INSIGHTS FROM A QUALITATIVE STUDY

DR. SUNIPA SAMADDER NANDY, PROF. (DR.) DIBYENDU BHATTACHARYYA

Abstract

Reflective teaching is a vital component of effective pedagogy, influencing educators' professional development and enhancing learning outcomes. The qualitative research design using a multiple case study approach was adopted. The data were collected through documents, classroom observations and semi-structured interviews with five purposively selected college teachers in West -Bengal. A computer-aided qualitative data analysis software, Atlas ti, was used to organize and manage the analysis process. Through the multiple case studies, thematic analysis was used to explore the research questions. Pedagogical practices, Creative practices and Application of Constructive approaches were the main three themes created. Each of them had a few sub-themes. Findings indicate that teachers creatively use reflective practice in several ways to enhance their teaching. They integrate a multidisciplinary approach, allowing students to see connections between various subjects, which fosters critical thinking and makes learning more relevant. Continuous professional development plays a crucial role as teachers engage in ongoing training and workshops, cultivating their skills and inspiring them to implement innovative strategies in the classroom. Furthermore, experimentation and risk-taking are evident, as teachers actively try new instructional methods, creating a culture of innovation that invites students to think creatively. A supportive environment is also vital; teachers establish a classroom atmosphere that promotes safety, openness, and collaboration, enabling students to express their ideas without fear of judgment. Additionally, teachers reflect on and analyze student feedback, using it to inform their practices, thereby refining their methods and enhancing the overall learning experience. In conclusion, this research paper offers a multifaceted exploration of reflective teaching and its implications for educators. It contributes to the ongoing discourse on pedagogy and professional development, emphasizing the importance of self-reflection in improving teaching practices and, ultimately, enhancing the quality of education. This study invites educators, researchers, and policymakers to engage in a broader conversation about the role of reflective teaching in shaping the future of education.

Article : Download PDF

Cite This Article

IESRJ

International Educational Scientific Research Journal

E-ISSN: 2455-295X

International Indexed Journal | Multi-Disciplinary Refereed Research Journal

ISSN: 2455-295X

Peer-Reviewed Journal - Equivalent to UGC Approved Journal

Peer-Reviewed Journal

Article No : 12

Number of Downloads : 42

References

1. Aberdeen, T. (2013c). Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 14(1), 69–71. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v14i1.73

2. Agouridas, V., & Race, P. (2007, March). Enhancing Knowledge Management in Design Education Through Systematic Reflection Practice. Concurrent Engineering, 15(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293x07076267

3. Al-Issa, A., & Al-Bulushi, A. (2010, January 1). Training English Language Student Teachers to Become Reflective Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education; Edith Cowan University. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n4.4

4. Aljohani, O., & Ahmad, Z. (2025). Lesson Planning in EFL: Raising Learners’ Awareness of the Use of English Imperatives. European Journal of Language and Culture Studies, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejlang.2025.4.1.142

5. Alt, D. (2018, July). Science teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning, ICT efficacy, ICT professional development and ICT practices enacted in their classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.020

6. Ball, R., & Fairlamb, A. (2025). The scaffolding effect: Supporting all students to succeed. Taylor & Francis.

7. Barnard, R., Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 636. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588247

8. Boyer, N. R., Maher, P. A., & Kirkman, S. (2006, October). Transformative Learning in Online Settings. Journal of Transformative Education, 4(4), 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344606295318

9. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry. G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843-860). Springer

10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

11. Brooke, M. (2012). Enhancing Pre-Service Teacher Training: The Construction and Application of a Model for Developing Teacher Reflective Practice Online. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 02(04), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2012.24023

12. Bugg, E. G., & Dewey, J. (1934, July). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. The American Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 528. https://doi.org/10.2307/1415632

13. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/qrj0902027

14. Chalmers, D. (2012). Review of Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education. AISHE-J, 4(2). https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/79

15. Chen, P. H., Hong, J. C., Ye, J. H., & Ho, Y. J. (2022, June 10). The Role of Teachers’ Constructivist Beliefs in Classroom Observations: A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904181

16. Chin Wei, C., Siong Choy, C., Geok Chew, G., & Yee Yen, Y. (2012, May 18). Knowledge sharing patterns of undergraduate students. Library Review, 61(5), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531211280469

17. Cirocco, M. (2007, November). How Reflective Practice Improves Nurses’ Critical Thinking Ability. Gastroenterology Nursing, 30(6), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sga.0000305221.78403.e9

18. Clouder, D. L. (2002, February). Reflective Teaching and Learning. Physiotherapy, 88(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9406(05)60948-0

19. Correction to: Classroom engagement dynamics: examining the potency of reflective teaching approach among some selected universities in Ghana. (2017, April 9). Reflective Practice, 18(6), 866–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2017.1316450

20. Creswell, T. J. (1994, December 1). 19. Dictionary Recognition of Developing Forms: The Case of snuck. The Publication of the American Dialect Society, 78(1), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1215/-78-1-144

21. Dampson, D. G., & Apau, S. K. (2019, March 25). Teacher in the Mirror: The reflective practices of Basic School Teachers in the Central Region of Ghana. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1914

22. Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2009). The Reflective Educator’s Guide to Classroom Research: Learning to Teach and Teaching to Learn Through Practitioner Inquiry. Corwin Press.

23. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute.

24. Dembo, M. H., Nicklin, J., & Griffiths, C. (2007). Motivation and learning strategies for college success. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203823149

25. Donoghue, Greg & Hattie, John. (2021). A Meta-Analysis of Ten Learning Techniques. Frontiers in Education. 6. 10.3389/feduc.2021.581216.

26. Dewey,  J. (1938).  Experience  &  education. New  York, NY: Touchstone.

27. Dignen, B., & Burmeister, T. (2020). Learning and development in the organizations of the future. Three pillars of organization and leadership in disruptive times (pp. 207–232). Cham: Springer.

28. Drijvers, P., Kieran, C., Mariotti, M., Ainley, J., Andresen, M., Chan, Y. C., Dana-Picard, T., Gueudet, G., Kidron, I., Leung, A., & Meagher, M. (2009). Integrating Technology into Mathematics Education: Theoretical Perspectives. In New ICMI studies series (pp. 89–132). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_7

29. Duarte, A., Andrade, J. G., & Dias, P. (2025). Digital tools and platforms for effective and personalized learning. IGI Global.

30. Duarte, A., Andrade, J. G., & Dias, P. (2025). Digital tools and platforms for effective and personalized learning. IGI Global.

31. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House Digital, Inc.

32. Escribano, R., Treviño, E., Nussbaum, M., Torres Irribarra, D., & Carrasco, D. (2020, January). How much does the quality of teaching vary at under-performing schools? Evidence from classroom observations in Chile. International Journal of Educational Development, 72, 102125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102125

33. Evangelou, F. (2023). TEACHING TECHNIQUES FOR DEVELOPING THE LEARNER–CENTRED APPROACH IN THE CLASSROOM. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i2.4667

34. Eyler, J. (2002, September). Reflection: Linking Service and Learning-Linking Students and Communities. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00274

35. Farrell, F. (2016, March 14). “Learning to listen”: boys’ gender narratives – implications for theory and practice. Education + Training, 58(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-06-2015-0046

36. Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage. Goldstein, D. M. (2014). Qualitative research in dangerous places: Becoming an “ethnographer” of violence and personal safety. Social Science Research Council.

37. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

38. Friese, S. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS.ti. SAGE Publications Limited.

39. Gagnon, Y. (2010). The case study as research method: A Practical Handbook. PUQ.

40. Goodley, C. (2018, February 27). Reflecting on being an effective teacher in an age of measurement. Reflective Practice, 19(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1437401

41. Gore, J. (2001, January). Progress in fMRI and applications to human cognition. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 11, S123. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-977x(01)80043-2

43. Gutierez, Sally. (2020). Teachers' reflective practice in lesson study: A tool for improving instructional practice.

44. Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Cengage Learning.

45. Habibi, A., Damasio, A., Ilari, B., Veiga, R., Joshi, A. A., Leahy, R. M., Haldar, J. P., Varadarajan, D., Bhushan, C., & Damasio, H. (2017, November 8). Childhood Music Training Induces Change in Micro and Macroscopic Brain Structure: Results from a Longitudinal Study. Cerebral Cortex, 28(12), 4336–4347. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx286

46. Harris, H.-Y., Lin, P.-Y., & Lee, Y.-H. (2019a). Developing effective knowledge-building environments through constructivist teaching beliefs and technology-integration knowledge: A survey of middle-school teachers in northern Taiwan. Learn. Individ. Dif., 76, 101787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101787

47. Hong, H.-Y., Lin, P.-Y., & Lee, Y.-H. (2019a). Developing effective knowledge-building environments through constructivist teaching beliefs and technology-integration knowledge: A survey of middle-school teachers in northern Taiwan. Learn. Individ. Dif., 76, 101787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101787

48. Hong, J.-C., Ye, J.-H., & Fan, J.-Y. (2019b). Policy acceptance of technical vocational education: A perspective from a new act on field study. J. Res. Educ. Sci., 64, 181–211. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201903_64(1).0007

49. Hong, J.-C., Ye, J.-H., Chen, P.-H., & Yu, Y.-Y. (2020). A checklist development for meaningful learning in classroom observation. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., 10, 728–735. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.10.1450

50. Hoque, M. E. (2017, September 9). An Introduction to the Second Language Acquisition. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335690866_An_Introduction_to_the_Second_Language_Acquisition

51. Howell, S. L., Williams, P. B., & Lindsay, N. K. (2003). Thirty-two trends affecting distance education: An informed foundation for strategic planning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6 (3). Jensen, E. (1996). Brain-based Learning. Del Mar, CA: Turning Point Publishing.

52. Huang, L., Zhang, T., & Huang, Y. (2020). Effects of school organizational conditions on teacher professional learning in China: The mediating role of teacher self-efficacy. Stud. Educ. Eval., 66, 100893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100893

53. Huang, T., Leung, A. K., Eom, K., & Tam, K. P. (2022). Important to me and my society: How culture influences the roles of personal values and perceived group values in environmental engagements via collectivistic orientation. J. Environ. Psychol., 80, 101774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101774

54. Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995, January). Constructivism and computer?mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649509526885

55. Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995, January). Constructivism and computer?mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649509526885

56. Joyce, T. M. (2014, January 1). Quality Basic Education for All: Challenges in Multi-Grade Teaching in Rural Schools. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n1p531

57. Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociol. Methods Res., 44, 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236

58. Khattri, N. (2021). Practice of ICT tools during Classroom Teaching in Private Universities of Jaipur, Rajasthan, IN. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3800146

59. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of ICT Use in Teaching and Learning: In the Context of Bangladeshi Tertiary Education. (2015, December 5). International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 4(12), 755–760. https://doi.org/10.21275/v4i12.nov152006

60. Korthagen, Fred, & Nuijten, Ellen. (2022). The Power of Reflection in Teacher Education and Professional Development: Strategies for In-Depth Teacher Learning. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003221470

61. Le, Phuc, & Benson, Karen. (2024). Enhancing reflective practice: Lessons learned and adjustments in scaffolding critical reflection in peer observation of teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 30, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2024.2402764

62. Leavy, P. (Ed.). (2014, July 1). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.001.0001

63. Loughran, T. (2002, December 1). Book Pricing Update -- Trends in Book Pricing by Subject Area -- June 30, 2002. Against the Grain, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176x.3956

64. Luetkemeyer, J., Adams, T., Davis, J., Redmond, T., & Hash, P. (2021). Creative practice in higher education: Decentering academic experiences. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 62(4), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis.62-4-2020-0097

65. Making a Difference through Reflective Practices: Values and actions. (2000, June). Reflective Practice, 1(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/713693153

66. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2011, January 1). Designing qualitative research. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317953591_Designing_qualitative_research

67. Marzano, M. (2007, April). Informed Consent, Deception, and Research Freedom in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406297665

68. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. SAGE.

69. Mathew, A., Mathew, J., Govind, M., & Mooppan, A. (2017). An Improved Transfer learning Approach for Intrusion Detection. Procedia Computer Science, 115, 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.09.132

70. Merriam, S. B. (2023). Nitel ara?t?rma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber [Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation] (S. Turan Çev. Ed.). Nobel Publishing.

71. Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage Publications.

72. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.

73. Myers, J. L. (2001, December). Self-evaluations of the “stream of thought” in journal writing. System, 29(4), 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(01)00037-9

74. Oduro, I. K., Akuta, A. B., & Kuranchie, A. (2022). Tutors’ Use of Reflective Practice to Promote Teaching and Learning. Creative Education, 13(07), 2308–2320. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.137147

75. Oduro, I. K., Akuta, A. B., & Kuranchie, A. (2022). Tutors’ Use of Reflective Practice to Promote Teaching and Learning. Creative Education, 13(07), 2308–2320. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.137147

76. Pacheco, A. Q. (2011, March 28). Reflective teaching and its impact on foreign language teaching. Actualidades Investigativas En Educación; University of Costa Rica. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v5i3.9166

77. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.(2008). PeraturanpemerintahRepublik Indonesia no 74 tahun 2008 tentang guru.Retrieved from http://unnes.ac.id/wpcontent/uploads/PP_74_Tahun_2008 .pdf.Accessed on December, 3rd 2017.

78. Pokhrel, S. (2021, November 9). Reflective teaching a requisite for Teacher Professional Development-A case Study in secondary education in the Kingdom of Bhutan. Bhutan Journal of Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.17102/bjrd.rub.10.2.004

79. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

80. Rayford, C. R. (2010). Reflective practice: The teacher in

81. Richardson, V. (1990, January 1). The evolution of reflective teaching and teacher education. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313102075_The_evolution_of_reflective_teaching_and_teacher_education

82. Richert, A. E. (1990, November). Teaching teachers to reflect: a consideration of programme structure. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(6), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027900220601

83. Ridder, H.-G. (2014). [Review of Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook 3 rd Edition, by M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, & J. Saldaña]. Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung / German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, 28(4), 485–487. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24332877

84. Ro, J. (2020, May). Curriculum, standards and professionalisation: The policy discourse on teacher professionalism in Singapore. Teaching and Teacher Education, 91, 103056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103056

85. Saldana, J. (2015). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE.

86. Sal Moslehian, A., Tucker, R., & Kocaturk, T. (2022, January). Diagrammatic Modelling Tools for Grounded Theory Research: The Implementation of a Multi-Representational Approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 160940692211270. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221127069

87. Schön, D. A. (1986, July 1). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education; Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377366.1986.10401080

88. Sch?n, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473

89. Selwyn, N. (2014). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times.

90. Selwyn, Neil. (2014). Digital Technology and the Contemporary University: Degrees of digitization. 10.4324/9781315768656.

91. Sidorenko, T. V., & Yampolsky, V. Z. (2015, January 1). SYSTEM ANALYSIS IN LANGUAGE TEAHING AND LEARNING IN TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY. Open Education, 4(111, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2015-4(111-8-14the mirror. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of  Nevada,  Las  Vegas.  Retrieved on  3rd August,  2018  from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/62875535.pdf.

92. Smith, J., Doe, A. and Roe, B. (2020) Impact of Online Pedagogical Feedback on Academic Performance: A Comparative Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 15, 123-136.

93. Spanner, Leigh. (2017). Student Engagement and Empowerment in Higher Education: Perspectives of students in England.

94. Stake, R. E. (1995b). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.

95. Tajik, L., Mirhosseini, S., & Ramezani, A. (2019). “Now as a teacher”: Novice Teachers Reflect on English Language Teacher Education in Iran. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3413

96. Trede, Franziska & Macklin, Rob & Bridges, Donna. (2012). Professional identity development: A review of the higher education literature. Studies in Higher Education. 37. 365-384. 10.1080/03075079.2010.521237.

97. The Role of ICT in Teaching and Learning Mathematics at College of Education: A Systematic Review. (2023, April). Journal of Education and Practice. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/14-12-06

98. Wellington, J. (2000) Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. Continuum, London.

99. Wellington, J. (2000) Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. Continuum, London.

100. Yalcin Arslan, F. (2019, January 2). Reflection in pre-service teacher education: exploring the nature of four EFL pre-service teachers’ reflections. Reflective Practice, 20(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1564652

101. Yalcin Arslan, F. (2019, January 2). Reflection in pre-service teacher education: exploring the nature of four EFL pre-service teachers’ reflections. Reflective Practice, 20(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1564652

102. Yazdanmehr, E., & Akbari, R. (2015, January 1). An expert EFL teacher’s class management. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319991184_An_expert_EFL_teacher’s_class_management

103. Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2006). Research Methods in Social Sciences. Ankara: Seckin Yayincilik