Volume : 8, Issue : 7, JUL 2022




The study focused on the impact of reading techniques on students reading comprehension in Ebonyi local government area of Ebonyi state. The specific purpose of this study was to find out whether reading comprehension tools and techniques such as graphic organizers, scaffolding, and SQ3R and vocabulary development have impact on students’ academic performance. Four objectives and four research questions were formulated to guide the study. The study utilized the descriptive survey research design. The population of the study consisted four thousand (4000) students and teachers from the five selected public schools in Ebonyi L.G.A. A sample size of 400 respondents was selected for the study through the simple random sampling technique. The instrument used for data collection was a structured questionnaire and a reading comprehension narrative passage. The instrument yielded a reliability index of 0.89 using Cronbach's Alpha. Statistical tools of mean and standard deviation were used for data analysis. Findings showed that the experimental group performed better than the control group as the students who were taught reading comprehension using graphic organizer, scaffolding, and SQ3R and vocabulary development performed better than those taught with the traditional method. Based on this, one of the recommendations is that teachers should utilize graphic organizer such as venn diagram, concept map, main idea web, circle map, T-chart in the reading classroom to improve students reading comprehension.



Article : Download PDF

Cite This Article

Article No : 3

Number of Downloads : 150


1. Albert, J.G (2009). Reading skills and mathematics. South African Journal of Higher Education, 16:196-206.
2. Alber, R. (2014). Teaching strategies: On-the-spot scaffolding for students. www.edutopia.org
3. Amir, A. & Amir, A (2019). The effect of reading strategies and speed reading on students’ reading comprehension skill in higher education. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA 2018). Advances in Social Science Education and Humanities Research. Retrieved from www.atlantis-press.com https://doi.org/10.2991/icla-18.2019.68
4. Anjuni, G.R & Cahyadi, R. (2019). Improving students reading comprehension through SQ3R (survey, question, read, recite and review) technique. Project Professional Journal of English Education, 2 (1), 1-6
5. Asuzu, C., (2009). Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: Examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 199 -214.
6. Bandura, J., (1997). Tutors can improve students’ reading skills, Reading Improvement 50(2), 48 – 53.
7. Brandon, D.(2021). The importance of reading comprehension. Home & Family. http://www.aces.edu
8. Caldwell, O. (2008) The influence of differing the paths to an incentive on third graders’ reading achievement and attitudes. Reading Psychology, 30(6),
9. Compe, A.S (2018). The impact of reading comprehension on academic performance of students’ comprehension: The goal of reading. www.readnaturally.com
10. Reading Rockets (2022). Comprehension. WETA Public Broadcasting http://www.readingrockets.org
11. Bradford, T.D & Hillarie, B.D (2014). Technological tools for improving student literacy. New York: Routledge
12. Graves, Y. & Graves. L.M (2003). Attitude toward reading expressed by elementary school students diagnosed with learning disabilities. Reading psychology 21: 271-282.
13. Jiang, X. & Grabe, W.(2007). Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Research findings and issues. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19, 34-55
14. Harris, F. & Graham, J.O. (2007). Using the expectancy and value model of motivation to understand the relationship between students’ attitudes and achievement in statistics. Statistics Education Research Journal 11(2)72-85
15. Hijaz, D.(2018). The relationship between students’ reading comprehension and their achievement in English. US-China Foreign Language, 16(3) 141-153
16. How to use graphic organizers to improve reading comprehension, www.differentiatedteaching.com
17. Igboke, B.U. (2012). Long-term working memory. Psychological review, 102(2), 211 – 245.
18. Lasim, M.S & Lasim, M. (2021). Enhancing reading comprehension of junior high school students through scaffolding instruction. http://www.atlantis-press.com
19. Menaka, B. & Jebaraj, J.S. (2017). Reading comprehension in relation to academic achievement in English among higher secondary students. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, 5 (5) 113-117
20. Min Ying, S.W & Abdul Aziz, A. (2019). Scaffolding approach with reading strategies in teaching reading comprehension in rural year 3 ESL learners in Malaysia. International Journal of current innovations in Advanced Research, 2 (5), 6-26
21. Mcnamara, F,(2007). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology. 77(6), 631-645.
22. Maduabuchi, E.I (2013). The cognitive and behavioural characteristic of children with low working memory. Child Development, 80,606-621.
23. Nawal, M.M (2019). Effects of vocabulary knowledge on reading comprehension. International Journal of English Literature and Culture, 7 (5), 85-91
24. Oakhill, J., Cain, K. & Elbro, C.(2014). Understanding and teaching reading comprehension: A handbook. Routledge: Oxford University Press
25. Omojuwa, P. (2007). Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge university press.
26. Patel, M.F & Jain, P.M (2008). English language teaching (methods, tools & techniques). Jaipur, India: Sunrise Publishers & Distributors
27. Robinson, H.L. (1946). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(40), 934-956.
28. Robinson, F.P. (1978). Effective study (4th edition). New York: Harper & Row.
29. Salem, A. (2017). Scaffolding reading comprehension skills. Journal English Language Teaching 10(1) www.ccsenet.org
30. Shanahan, C. (2022). Page 11: Using graphic organizer.Vanderbilt University, Nashville. iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu
31. Smith, E. M (2004). Young-beginner readers of French through strategy instruction. Applied Linguistics, 29(1),90-96.
32. Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
33. Tompkins, I.I, (2011). Making a case for the teaching of reading across the curriculum in higher education, South African Journal of Education, 32, 205-214.
34. Wandi, S. (2017). Improving students reading comprehension by using SQ3R method. Journal of English and Arabic Language Learning. 8(2), 133-140
35. Yamashita, D.M. (2004). Strategy instruction in reading comprehension: An intervention study for students with learning disabilities. Learning disabilities: A contemporary Journal 5(1), 41-57.