Volume : 3, Issue : 8, AUG 2017




In the present paper, an attempt has been made to study the quantitative geomorphological analysis of Upper Karha watershed, Western Maharashtra, India. Geomorphological parameters are calculated on the basis of Survey of India toposheets 47F-15, 47 J-3, 4 and 7at 1: 50000 scale, and ASTER DEM (2016) with 30m spatial resolutions. The morphometric analysis of study area has been carried out using Arc GIS 9.3 software. The study area covers 400 sq.km. Morphological characteristics of the watershed as appear in shape, size, number, order, length, Dd, Sf, Rb, Fs, T, Rc are derived to trace its usefulness for surface development. The present study involves Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis technique to evaluate and compare linear, relief and aerial morphometry of Upper Karha watershed. Upper Karha watershed is basically 6th order watershed and mainly dendritic to sub dendritic drainage pattern. Drainage density and texture of the drainage basin is 3.15 km/km2, 17.84 respectively. The drainage frequency of Upper Karha watersheds is 4.37 whereas the mean bifurcation ratio is 3.87. Hence from the study it can be conclude that GIS technique proves to be competent tool in morphometric analysis.


Morphometric analysis, ASTER DEM, Arc GIS, Drainage frequency, Drainage density, Surface Development.

Article : Download PDF

Cite This Article

Article No : 12

Number of Downloads : 578


1. Clark, Morphometry from Map, Essay in geomorphology. Elsevier publ. co. New York, 1966, pp 235-274. 2. Morisawa M., Geomorphology text book; rivers, forms and process, Chapter 5, ‘Structural and lithologycal control’, 1985.
3. Strahler A.N., Quantitative geomorphology of basin and channel network, Hand book of applied Hydrology (Ed. Ven Te Chow), McGraw-Hill book company, New York, section 4-II, 1964. 4. Zende A. M., R. Nagarajan, Drainage Morphology for Water Resources development of Sub watershed in Krishna River Basin, International Journal of computer and communication Technology, 2(3), 2011, pp: 13-21. 5. Bhagwat TN, Shetty A, Hegde VS (2011) Spatial variation in drainage characteristics and geomorphic instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH); implications for watershed management— a case study of the Varada River basin, Northern Karnataka. Catena 87:52–59 6. Chorowicz J, Ichoku C, Raizanoff S, Kim Y, Cervelle B (1992) A combined algorithm for automated drainage network extraction. Water Resour Res 28:1293–1302 7. Schumm SA (1961) Sediment sources and drainage basin characteristics in upper Cheyenne River basin. Washington DC: US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1531-B, 198 8. Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins. Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 56(3):275–370 9. Miller VC (1953) A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee, Proj. NR 389–402, Tech. Rep. 3. Columbia University, Department of Geology, ONR, New York 10. Nag SK (1998) Morphometric analysis using remote sensing techniques in the Chaka sub-basin, Purulia District, West Bengal. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 26(1 & 2):69–76 11. Nag SK, Chakraborty S (2003) Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage network in hard rock area. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 31(1):25–35 12. Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Am Bull 67:597–646 Schumm 13. Singh S, Dubey A (1994) Geoenvironmental planning of watersheds in India. Chugh Publications, Allahabad, pp 28–69 Singh S, 14. Smith KG (1950) Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. Am J Sci 248:655–668
15. Sreedevi PD, Owais S, Khan H, Ahmed S (2009) Morphometric analysis of a watershed of South India using SRTM data and GIS. J Geol Soc Ind 73:543–552 16. Sreedevi PD, Sreekanth PD, Khan HH, Ahmed S (2013) Drainage morphometry and its influence on hydrology in an semi arid region: using SRTM data and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 70:839–848 17. Strahler AN (1952) Hypsometic (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Bull Geol Soc Am 63:1117–1142 18. Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913–920 19. Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow VT (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 4–76