Volume : 4, Issue : 5, MAY 2018
URINARY MERCURY AND HAIRY HEAVY METALS LEVELS IN PATIENTS WITH AMALGAM FILLINGS
AL-FAWAEIR SAAD, KURT I, OKTAY E.A, SERDAR M.A, AYKUT O
Aim: In this study we aimed to evaluate the levels of urinary mercury (Hg) and hairy heavy metals levels in subjects with amalgam fillings. Subjects and Methods: From March 2012 to May 2013, specimen collection was conducted in Dentistry department in Gullhane Military Medical Academy in Ankara. The study group consisted of 102 patients have amalgam fillings from different periods of time and 32 healthy subjects as control group. The members of both groups were enrolled in the study voluntarily. Urine and hair samples were collected from these subjects. Mercury levels in urine and heavy metals levels in hair were measured using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). Results: The mean of urinary mercury level ± SD was significantly higher in patients group (6.4±3.8μg/L) in comparison with that in control group (2.5±1.3μg/L) (p<0.001). A strong correlation was found between urinary mercury levels and both number and duration of amalgam fillings (Pearson rank 0, 768 and 0,823 respectively). The mean ± SD of mercury concentration in hair was significantly higher in patients group in comparison with healthy group (0.78±0.15 vs. 0.48±0.24 μg/g hair) (p<0.001). The results did not reach the toxic level of human body (150 μg/g hair). There is no correlation between the number of amalgam fillings and Hg levels in hair and there a positive correlation between Hg levels and the duration of amalgam fillings (r=0.876). The levels of Hg, Zn, B, V, Cr, Mo, Mn, Be, Sn, Cu, As, Ag, Cd, Pd, and Ni were found significantly higher in hair samples of patients group (p<0.05). Conclusion: These exploratory findings suggest that the amalgam fillings contribute the body mercury burden by showing an increase in urinary mercury and hair mercury levels.
Mercury, Amalgam Fillings, Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry.
Article : Download PDF
Cite This Article
Article No : 16
Number of Downloads : 310
1. Radcliffe HE, Swanson GM, Fisher LJ. Human exposure to mercury: a critical assessment of the evidence of adverse health effects .J. Toxicology Environ Health, 1996; 49:221. 2. Watanabe C, Satoh H, Evolution of our understanding of methyl mercury as a health threat. Environ Health Perspect 1996; 104(Supp 2):367. 3. Ucar Y, Brantly WA, Biocompatibility of dental amalgams. Int JDent; 2011; 2011:981595 4. Ferracane, Jack L. (2001). Materials in Dentistry: Principles and Applications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 3. 5. Martin MD,Wood JS. The safety of dental amalgam in children. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2006 Nov; 5(6):773-81. 6. Stobir T, Bonacker D, Bohm K. Disturbed microtubule function and induction of micronuclei by chelate complexes of mercury (II). Mutat Res 2004, 563:97-106. 7. Morton J, Carolan VA, Gardiner PHE (2002) Removal of exogenously bound elements from human hair by various procedures and determinations by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometery. Anal Chim Acta 455:23-34. 8. Dunn JE, Trachtenberg FL, Barregard L, Bellinger D, McKinlay. Scalp hair and urine mercury content of children in the Northeast United States: the New England Children’s Amalgam Trial. Environ Res 2008; 107: 79–88. 9. Woods JS, Martin MD, Leroux BG, DeRouen TA,Leita˜o JG, Bernardo MF. The contribution of dental amalgam to urinary mercury excretion in children. Environ Health Perspect 2007; 115: 1527–1531. 10. Geier DA, Carmody T, Kern JK, King PG, andGeier MR. A significant relationship between mercury exposure from dental amalgams and urinaryporphyrins: a further assessment of the Casa Pia children’s dental amalgam trial. Biometals 2011. 11. Woods JS, Echeverria D, Heyer NJ, Simmonds PL, Wilkerson J, Farin FM. The association between genetic polymorphisms of coproporphyrinogen oxidase and an atypical porphyrinogenic response to mercury exposure in humans. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005 Aug 7; 206 (2):113-20.
12. Berglund A, Molin M: Mercury vapor release from dental amalgam in patients with symptoms allegedly caused by amalgam fillings. Eur J Oral Sci 104; 56-63: 1996. 13. Luglie PF, Campus G, Chessa G, et al: Effect of amalgam fillings on the mercury concentration in human amniotic fluid. Arch Gynecol Obstet 271; 138-142: 2005. 14. Takahashi Y, Tsuruta S, Arimoto M, et al: Placental transfer of mercury in pregnant rats which received dental amalgam restorations. Toxicology 185; 23-33: 2003. 15. Yasuda H, Yoshida K, Fukuchi K, et al: Association of aging with minerals in male Japanese adults. Anti-Aging Medicine 4; 38-42: 2007. 16. Murphy TK, Calle EE, Rodriguez C, et al: Body mass index and colon cancer mortality in a large prospective study. Am J Epidemiology 152; 847-854: 2000? 17. Patel AV, Rodriguez C, Bernstein L, et al: Obesity, recreational physical activity, and risk of pancreatic cancer in a large U.S. Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14; 459-466: 2005.