Volume : 6, Issue : 11, NOV 2020

ROLE OF WOMEN WORKING IN HEALTH CARE SECTORS DURING THE CORONA PERIOD IN TAMILNADU

DR. S.THANIKASALAM

Abstract

In order to curb and suppress corona virus entire world administration, government and managements have been putting their ultimate effort and work effectively along with help and cooperation of the global citizens. Despite many more organs and sectors were played significant role in uprooting and annihilating corona virus from global soil, the attitudes, working hours, sincerity and dedications of the women in the global health sectors context and perceptions seems to be invincible and praiseworthy by all people. In global scenario and administrative gamut of health sectors women have been occupied numerous posting because hospital needs passionate, compassionate, sympathetic, merciful and consoling candidates, in this aspects women workers are seems to be suitable and apt for carry out all types of hospitals works. Corona have been threatening and intimating all people from ordinary citizens to army people, to ruling people, to control and contain all its drastic and dangerous impact on this society and people would not be forgiven and left out without firing corona and suppressing it. Though corona has been destroying entire people’s life and needs and necessities, its destructive impact on each one of us life has been so panic and fearful without an alternative ways and path to rectify its impact on social system. Regarding to this research styles, this study has been made by researcher to know, comprehend and understand about thoughtful and dedicative duty and role of the women workers from sweepers to doctors are seems to be procurable and praiseworthy during the corona period.

Keywords

EFFECT OF CORONA, TAMILNADU GOVERNMENT ROLE, GOD MEDICINES, TIMELY ACTIONS, REMEDIAL MEASURES AND GOOD ADMINISTRATION.

Article : Download PDF

Cite This Article

Article No : 5

Number of Downloads : 329

References

  1. Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index. Boskin MJ, Dulberger E, Gordon RJ, Griliches Z, Jorgenson DW, editors. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1996. [accessed May 2010]. Toward a More Accurate Measure to the Cost of Living: Final Report to the Senate Finance Committee from the Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index. Available http://www.ssa.gov/history/reports/boskinrpt.html.
  2. Aizcorbe A, Nestoriak N. The Importance of Pricing the Bundle of Treatments. Bureau of Economic Analysis Working Paper. 2008. [accessed September 2010]. Available: http://www.bea.gov/papers/pdf/wp2008-04_bundle_treatments_paper.pdf.
  3. Aizcorbe AM, Flamm K, Khurshid A. The Role of Semiconductor Inputs in IT Hardware Price Decline: Computers vs. Communications. Paper provided by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Systems Finance and Economics Discussion Series No. 2002-37. 2002. [accessed May 2010]. Available: http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2002/200237/200237pap.pdf.
  4. Aizcorbe AM, Retus BA, Smith S. Toward a health care satellite account, Survey of Current Business. May 24–30, 2008.
  5. Akobundu E, Ju J, Blatt L, Mullins CD. Cost-of-illness studies: A review of current methods. PharmacoEconomics. 2006;24:869–890. [PubMed]
  6. American Medical Association. A Framework for Measuring Healthcare Efficiency and Value. Prepared by the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement® Work Group on Efficiency and Cost of Care. 2008. [accessed May 2010]. Available: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/370/framewk_meas_efficiency.pdf.
  7. Andresen EM, Rothenberg BM, Kaplan RM. Performance of a self-administered mailed version of the Quality of Well-Being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults. Medical Care. 1998;36(9):1349–1360. [PubMed]
  8. AQA Alliance. AQA Principles of “Efficiency” Measures. 2006. [accessed May 2010]. Available: http://www.aqaalliance.org/files/PrinciplesofEfficiencyMeasurementApril2006.doc.
  9. Arbitman DB. A primer on patient classification systems and their relevance to ambulatory care. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management. 1986;9:58–81. [PubMed]
  10. Archibald RB. On the theory of industrial price measurement: Output price indexes. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement. 1977;6:57–72.
  11. Arias E. U.S. life tables, 2004. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2007. [accessed May 2010]. p. 16. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr56/nvsr56_09.pdf.
  12. Atkinson T. Atkinson Review: Final report Measurement of Government Output and Productivity for the National Accounts. Hampshire, England: Palgrave-Macmillan; 2005.
  13. Averill RF, Goldfield NI, Wynn ME, McGuire TE, Jmullin RL, Gregg LW, Bender JA. Design of a prospective payment patient classification system for ambulatory care—Medicare and Medicaid managed care: Issues and evidence. Health Care Financing Review. Sep, 1993. [accessed September 2010]. Available: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0795/is_n1_v15/ai_15268435/?tag=content;col1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Balk BM. Industrial Price, Quantity and Productivity Indices. Boston: Kluwer Academic; 1998.
  15. Banks J, Marmot M, Oldfield Z, Smith JP. Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2006;295:2037–2045. [PubMed]
  16. Berk A, Paringer L, Mushkin SJ. The economic cost of illness, fiscal 1975. Medical Care. 1978;16:785–790. [PubMed]
  17. Berlowitz DR, Rosen AK, Moskowitz MA. Ambulatory care case-mix measures. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1995;10:162–170. [PubMed]
  18. Berndt ER, Busch SH, Frank RG. Price Indexes for Acute Phase Treatment of Depression, NBER Working Paper W6799. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 1998.
  19. Berndt ER, Cutler DM, Frank RG, Griliches Z, Newhouse JP, Triplett JE. Medical care prices and output. Handbook of Health Economics. Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, editors. 1A. North Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000. pp. 120–180.
  20. Bild DE, Stevenson JM. Frequency of recording of diabetes on U.S. death certificates: Analysis of the 1986 National Mortality Followback Survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1991;45(3):275–281. [PubMed]
  21. Black C, McGrail K, Fooks C, Baranek P, Maslove L. Data, Data Everywhere …: Improving Access to Population Health and Health Services Research Data in Canada. The Canadian Policy Research Networks and the Centre for Health Services and Policy Research. 2004. [accessed March 2009]. Available: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/28082.html.
  22. Bloom BS, Bruno DJ, Maman D, Jayadevappa R. Usefulness of cost of illness studies in health care decision making. PharmacoEconomics. 2001;19:207–213. [PubMed]
  23. Bolin K, Jacobson L, Lindgren B. The family as the health producer: When spouses are Nash-bargainers. Journal of Health Economics. 2001;20:349–362. [PubMed]
  24. Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Medical Care. 2004;42(9):851–859. [PubMed]
  25. Brazier JE, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics. 2002;21(2):271–292. [PubMed]
  26. Bureau of Economic Analysis. A Satellite Account for Research and Development. 1994. [accessed September 2010]. Available: http://bea.gov/scb/account_articles/national/1194od/maintext.htm.
  27. Burnette K, Mokyr J. The standard of living through the ages. The State of Humanity. Simon JL, editor. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 1995. pp. 135–147.
  28. Cai L, Hayward MD, Saito Y, Lubitz J, Hagedorn A, Crimmins E. Estimation of multi-state life table functions and their variability from complex survey data using the SPACE Program. Demographic Research. 2003. [accessed September 2010]. Art. 6. Available: http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol22/6/22-6.pdf. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  29. Capewell S, Allender S, Critchley J, Lloyd-Williams F, O’Flaherty M, Rayner M, Scarborough P. Modeling the UK Burden of Cardiovascular Disease to 2020: A Research Report for the Cardio & Vascular Coalition and the British Heart Foundation. London, England: British Heart Foundation; 2008. [accessed May 2010]. Available: http://www.heartofmersey.org.uk/uploads/documents/oct_08/hom_1223379066_Modelling_PDF_for_website_7th_.pdf.
  30. Casale AS, Paulus RA, Selna MJ, Doll MC, Bothe AE. ProvenCare: A provider-driven pay-for-performance program for acute episodic cardiac surgical care. Annals of Surgery. 2007;246(4):613–623. [PubMed]
  31. Catlin A, Cowan C, Heffler S, Washington B. National health spending in 2005: The slowdown continues. Health Affairs. 2007;26(January/February):142–153. [PubMed]
  32. Catron B, Murphy B. Hospital price inflation: What does the new PPI tell us. Monthly Labor Review. 1996. [accessed May 2010]. pp. 24–31. Available: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1996/07/art3full.pdf. [PubMed]
  33. Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE. Multilateral comparison of output, input and productivity using superlative index numbers. Economic Journal. 1982;92:73–86.
  34. Center on the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health. The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry. Tufts-New England Medical Center; 2007. [accessed May 2010]. Available: https://research.tufts-nemc.org/cear/default.aspx.
  35. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NCHS Data Linkage Activities. 2010. [accessed May 2010]. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/data_linkage_activities.htm.
  36. Champion JAI, editor. Epidemic Disease in London, Centre for Metropolitan History Working Papers Series, No 1. London, England: Centre for Metropolitan History, University of London; 1993. –320.