Volume : 3, Issue : 8, AUG 2017
FACTORS AFFECTING IMPLEMENTATION OF STUDENT CENTERED METHOD IN MATHEMATICS CLASSES: THE CASE OF OTONA SECONDARY SCHOOL GRADE 10, WOLAYTA ZONE, SNNPR REGION.
TEMESGEN SAMUEL ASALE
The purpose of this study was to explore factors that affecting the implementation of effective active learning method in Otonasecondary school focused on grade 10Mathematics class. The total population of the study was 3 Mathematics teachers and 30 students from two sections (A&B) of grade 10 and school director. Teachers were selected by use of purposive sampling technique whereas the students were selected by using systematic sampling technique from each section of grade 10.The main instruments of data collection for this study were close ended questioners, focused interview and structured classroom observation check list. Then the data were gathered through these instruments and were presented, analyzed and interpreted by using a mixture of quantitative and qualitative data descriptive method using percentage in table and qualitative explanation. In conclusion the findings indicated the factors that impacted implementation of student centered method related to teachers were, suitability of classroom conditions: like a large number of students in a class, and traditional classroom sitting arrangements were the major one. As a result teachers do not have perception, interest persistence to apply active learning method in the class. On account of lack of teacher’s initiation to motivate and encourage their students the student’s participation was very low. In general the study showed that the teachers dominated the classroom activities by making students passive listeners although only 33% of teachers have an effort to practice student centered method it is not sufficient. Because this 33% uses only one kind of technique of active learning method namely answer and question method. Consequently, giving short term training for teachers in service about how to implement student centered method, building additional classroom to balance the number of students in a classroom, fulfilling different facilities and giving awareness for the students about the importance of student centered method highly recommended in order to apply student centered method in mathematics class.
Approach, Method, Techniques, Implementation, Practice, Perception, Active learning, Student centered.
Article : Download PDF
Cite This Article
Article No : 14
Number of Downloads : 1152
1. Alemayehu Belachewu (2004:95). Motivation and interest of student to wards active learning. Jimma University. 2. Amare Asegdom (2000). Communication and Medial study in curriculum. UN published teaching material. A.A.U.
3. Awalel,G (20016), Factors that affect students center method, in yem woreda wsu un published . 4. Baeten M. (2010). Methods of Active learning environment. Educational Research Review. 5. (3).243 – 260 5. Best J.W and Kahn J.V (2003). Research in education. Old Dominion University. 6. Biadgelign Ademe (2010). General teaching learning methods and Techniques. A.A.U Printing press. 7. Bon well C. & Eison J.A (2003). Active learing; creating Excitement in the classroom. Grips, Rheni, PP. 38. 106 & 132. Elson hand out P.66. 8. Boteswana (2009) , pedalogical classroom practice and social contexts, in sub sahara Africa,-UNESCO. 9. Brad H. (2000) Teacher centered instruction Vs student centered instruction. American government schools. Armuch high school 3p. MA Thesis (UN published). 10. Brein et al (2005) developing social class room learning, Brein Research and Health. 11. Brent R. (1996) Navigating the Bumpy road to student centered method. Institution College teaching. 44, 43 – 47. 12. Brush T. & Saye J. (2000). Implementation & evolution of student centered learning; a case study. Educational technology Research and Development 48 (3), 79 – 100. 13. Capel S et al (1995). Learning to teach in secondary school. WWW. Um. Edu/mt/educ/ student/ ms B4345. 14. Chall J. (2000). The Academic Challenge: what really works in the class room? Network. Guil Ford. 15. Collins J & O’ Brien N (2003). The green wood dictionary of education. West port CT. Green wood. 16. Fern et al (2005). Directions in mathematics education: Active learning & the limited Mathematics proficient student. Vol. 1 No 2:3. 17. Fessiha Abera (2001). Hampering factors to implement Active learning in some selected 2nd cycle secondary school in Tigray. UN published MA Thesis A.A.U school of graduate studies pp 10 – 20. 18. Harmer (2003) TEFL Motivation in the classroom # 336. WWW. Tef/ corp.com/ Articles/77- Tef/m… 19. ICDIR (1999). Teacher education. Hand Book. Addis Ababa; Finifinnee print and publisher. 20. Joyce B & Weil M (Eds). (2000). Models of teaching. Boston.
21. Klionsky D.J (2004). Talking Biology; learning out side the book & the lecture. American society for cell Biology Edu. (3); 204 – 211). 22. Lea S.J (2003). Higher education students attitudes t student centered learning; beyond educational bulimia. Studies in Higher Education. 28(3), 321- 334. 23. Lejeun N (2001) Learner centered teaching practice. Retrieved read 3 December 2010. 24. Leu E. (2000). The role of curriculum Integration in Basic Education. Tigray Education Bureau.( Un - published) 25. Little wood V (2007). Communicative mathematics Teaching Cambridge. Cambridge University press. 26. Longer and corter (1995:208-2012). The interaction hypotheses. Eric- US department of education. 27. Mccartny E (1994) .Educational psychology: Theory and practice (4th Ed) Boston, Allgn & Bacon. 28. Michael J (1998). Creative Approach to class room teaching. New Deli: Discovery. 29. MoE (2002). The education and training policy & its implementation. A.A.U of Education. 30. Lamathaka et a. (2000). Teacher Training Resource. Hand Book. Innovative Approach to Teaching and learning. Malawi: Save the Children Federation Inc. 31. Paulson P.R Faust J. (2003). Active learning Promotes Higher lever of Education. WWW.iiste. Org/../17327. 32. Plass H. (1998) he learner centered class room: Quality of Secondary Education in Ethiopia. A.A.U printing press. 33. Pollard D,(2003),Mixed ability group in secondary school UNLU, college of education. 34. Richards J.C (2001). Approach & Methods of Mathematics Teaching.USA: Cambridge University press. 35. Silverman (1996),Arranging the physical environment of the classroom to – ODU. 36. Wohlfarth. D (2008). Student perceptions of learner centered. Institution College teaching 44; 43 – 47. 37. Yonas A (2006). Factors Affecting student centered in secondary school of west Harrarge.A.A.U un published MA Thesis