Volume : 11, Issue : 2, FEB 2025
EARLY INTERVENTION PHYSIOTHERAPY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MANAGEMENT IN LUMBAR RADICULAR SYNDROME: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL PROTOCOL
AMIT PUROHIT, DR. MUKESH KUMAR GOYAL
Abstract
Background: Lumbar radicular syndrome (LRS) affects 3-5% of the population with significant economic burden. Current management typically delays physiotherapy until 6+ weeks post-diagnosis, potentially missing the critical neuroplasticity window for optimal recovery.
Objective: To compare early intervention physiotherapy (initiated ≤2 weeks) versus conventional delayed physiotherapy in patients with acute-to-subacute LRS across composite outcomes: pain, functional disability, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.
Methods: Randomized controlled trial enrolling 150 participants (75 per group) with clinically confirmed LRS of <4 weeks duration. Group I receives intensive physiotherapy (2x/week for 4 weeks, then 1x/week for 8 weeks) initiated within 2 weeks of diagnosis. Group II receives standard medical care for 6 weeks, then identical physiotherapy delivered in compressed timeline. Primary outcome: pain reduction (Numerical Pain Rating Scale). Secondary outcomes: functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index), quality of life (SF-36), neurological assessment, cost-effectiveness analysis, and patient satisfaction.
Key Innovations: This study addresses a critical gap in early intervention research specific to LRS, examining composite outcomes rather than isolated pain or disability measures, and includes rigorous cost-effectiveness analysis informing healthcare resource allocation.
Expected Implications: This research will provide evidence-based guidance on optimal physiotherapy timing in acute LRS management and may support paradigm shift from delayed reactive treatment to early proactive intervention as standard care.
Keywords
LUMBAR RADICULAR SYNDROME, EARLY INTERVENTION, PHYSIOTHERAPY, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL, COST-EFFECTIVENESS, NEUROPLASTICITY.
Article : Download PDF
Cite This Article
IESRJ
International Educational Scientific Research Journal
E-ISSN: 2455-295X
International Indexed Journal | Multi-Disciplinary Refereed Research Journal
ISSN: 2455-295X
Peer-Reviewed Journal - Equivalent to UGC Approved Journal
Peer-Reviewed Journal
Article No : 19
Number of Downloads : 72
References
1. Stafford MA, Pincus T, Bronfort G. Musculoskeletal pain research: a systematic review of the effectiveness of manipulative and medicinal agents. Spine. 2007;32(2):235-246.
2. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Peul WC. Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica. British Medical Journal. 2007;334(7589):1313-1317.
3. Kobayashi S, Merriam WF, Youstine D, et al. The role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha on pain-related behavior produced by nucleus pulposus application to nerve roots. Spine. 2000;25(17):2186-2191.
4. Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, et al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2014;73(6):968-974.
5. Pincus T, Burton AK, Vogel S, Field AP. A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine. 2002;27(5):E109-E120.
6. Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 2008;51(1):S225-S239.
7. Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain. 2011;152(3):S2-S15.
8. Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans R, et al. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for acute low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. The Spine Journal. 2004;4(3):335-356.
9. Page MJ, Green S, McBain B, et al. Manual therapy and exercise for rotator cuff disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016;(6):CD012224.
10. Grindem H, Eitzen I, Engebretsen L, et al. Extensive eccentric training as treatment for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a 14-year follow-up of kyriakides study. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016;50(12):729-736.
11. Lundstrom A, Nordstrom A, Kallings LV, Norberg M, Eriksson JW, Hammarström A. Adherence to health-enhancing physical activity recommendation in adults: the role of previous physical activity, timing and other modifiable factors. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2014;11(1):69.
12. Adkins DL, Boychuk J, Remple MS, Kleim JA. Motor training induces experience-dependent plasticity of movement representations in adult primary motor cortex. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 2006;86(2):179-190.
13. Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. The Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356-2367.
