Volume : 5, Issue : 3, MAR 2019

COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MAITLAND MOBILIZATION AND MULLIGAN MOBILIZATION WITH MOVEMENT ON FUNCTIONAL INDEX IN FEMALES WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

DR.SADDAM HUSSAIN SHAIK, DR.C.SHANTI, DR.K.SENTHIL KUMAR, DR. K.MADHAVI

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis is defined as a heterogeneous group of conditions that lead to major public health problems that causes functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Objectives: To find out the effectiveness of Maitland mobilization and Mulligan mobilization with movement on muscular strength by Iso-kinetic analyzer, and functional performance by knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scale (KOOS). Method: 40 female subjects were randomly assigned into Maitland mobilizations and mulligan mobilization with movement along with conventional therapy for 3sessions per week for 6 weeks. Patients were evaluated of KOOS and Peak torque of knee extensors by Isokinetic were measured at pre , 3rd week and 6th week of treatment. Results: KOOS shows statistically significant (p<0.05) improvement in 2 groups. In right Knee extension at 30 degrees shows highly significant (p<0.01) between the groups, but left KE at 30 degrees shows insignificant Conclusion: The present randomized control trial has investigated the effectiveness of Maitland mobilization and mulligan MWM along with conventional therapy on pain, symptoms, ADL, QOL, sports and recreations, and peak torque of the quadriceps in female subjects with knee osteoarthritis. The study shows improvement in both groups but Mulligan mobilization MWM is more effective than Maitland mobilization. Thus, this study concludes that the Mulligan’s MWM is more effective in treating the subjects with knee OA.

Keywords

KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS, MAITLAND MOBILIZATION, MULLIGAN MOBILIZATION WITH MOVEMENT, KNEE INJURY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OF KNEE(KOOS).

Article : Download PDF

Cite This Article

Article No : 12

Number of Downloads : 426

References

1. Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis & Rheumatism 1986; 29(8):1039- 1049. 2. Chandra Prakash Pal, Pulkesh Singh, and Ashok Vij. Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in India and related factors. Indian J Ortho. 2016 Sep; 50(5): 518-522. 3. Banks K, Hengeveld E. Maitland’s Clinical Companion: An Essential Guide for Students. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2009. 4. Aniqa Kiran, Muhammad Junaid Ijaz et al. Comparison of Efficacy of Mulligan’s Mobilization with Movement with Maitland Mobilization along with Conventional Therapy in the Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. 2018;10.232.74.27 5. Kettel Kamp DB: Clinical implication of knee biomechanics. Arch surg 1973; 107; 406. 6. Cicuttini FM, Spector TD. Genetics of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1996; 55(9):65–67. 7. Angie lalnunpuii; bibhuti sarkar; sarfaraz alam; ameed equebal; abhishek biswas. Efficacy of mulligan mobilisation as compared to maitland mobilisation in females with knee osteoarthritis: a double blind randomized controlled trial.2016; 6(2): 37-45 8. Reepa avichal ughreja , yagna u shukla, mulligan’s mobilisation with movement (mwm) relieves pain and improves functional status in osteoarthritis knee int j physiother. Vol 4(2), 132-138, april (2017) 9. Mulligan , B., Manual therapy ,-“NAGS”, “SNAGS”, “MWMS” etc.5thed 2004. 10. Hing W, Bigelow R, Bremner T: Mulligan’s mobilisation with movement: a review of the tenets and prescription of MWMs. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy 2008;36 (3):144-164. 11. Maitland GD, Hengeveld E, Banks K, editors. Maitland’s peripheral manipulation. 4th ed. Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann; 2005 12. BD Chaurasias human anatomy.vol.2;143-149 13. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, et al. measures of adult pain. Arthritis care research. 2011 ;63:240-252. 14. Shubhranshu S Mohanthy, Hithesh Garg. Text book of orthopaedics and trauma. Vol.4;pg: 2988-293. 15. J.H.Kellgren, J.S.Lawrence. kellgren-Lawrence grading scale to assess severity of knee osteoarthritis. 16. Jagmohan singh. Textbook of electrotherapy . superficial heating modalities. Chapter 7;pg.220-225. 17. John Low, Ann reed. Therapeutic conduction heating. Electrotherapy explained principles and practice.3rd edition;pg:241-254. 18. Dena Gardiner. Principles of exercise therapy. 4th edition;pg82-83. 19. Takasaki H, Hall T, and Jull G. Immediate and short-term effects of Mulligan's mobilization with movement on knee pain and disability associated with knee osteoarthritis – A prospective case series Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, Informa Healthcare USA 2012;1-9. 20. Kumar A ,Ganesh B.R Combined effectiveness of Maitland mobilization and patellar taping in patellofemoral osteoarthritis. A randomized clinical trial .Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy. 2011; 5(1):45-47. 21. Shenouda M.M.S.S Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Mobilization with Movement on Pain, Disability and Range of Motion In Patients With knee Osteoarthritis. Bull. Fac. Ph. Th. Cairo Univ 2013; 18(1): 65-72. 22. Makofsky H, Panicker S, Abbruzzese J, Aridas C, Camp M, Drakes J, et al. Immediate effect of grade IV inferior hip joint mobilization on hip abductor torque: a pilot study. J Manual Manipulative Ther. 2007;15(2):103 23. Yerys S, Makofsky H, Byrd C, Pennachio J, Cinkay J. Effect of mobilization of the anterior hip capsule on gluteus maximus strength. J Manual Manipulative Ther. 2002;10(4):218- 224 24. Liebler EJ, Tufano-Coors L, Douris P, Makofsky H, McKenna R, Michels C, et al. The effect of thoracic spine mobilization on lower trapezius strength testing. J Manual Manipulative Ther. 2001;9(4):207-12. 12. 25. Hanrahan S, Van Lunen BL, Tamburello M, Walker ML. The short-term effects of joint mobilizations on acute mechanical low back dysfunction in collegiate athletes.J Athl Train. 2005;40(2):88. 26. Ivarsson A, Andersen MB, Johnson U, Lindwall M(2013) To adjust or not adjust: Nonparametric effect sizes, confidence intervals, and real-world meaning. Psychol Sport Exerc 14: 97-102. 27. Cheraladhan E. Sambandam, Sejal N.Sailor, Jagatheesan Alagesan 2011. Effect of Mulligan mobilization and maitland Mobilization in subjects with unilateral Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis-Randomized Controlled Trail / JPBMS, 2011, 11[17]. 28. Hiroshi Takasaki, Toby Hall, and Gwendolen Jull, Immediate and short-term effects of Mulligan's mobilization with movement on knee pain and disability associated with knee osteoarthritis – A prospective case series. 2012. 29. Monika sharma, Harpreet kaur, Parul rathore, Kopal pajnee,2014 Effect Of Proximal & Distal Fibular Glide In The Subjects With Knee Osteoarthritis. 30. D. Oskay, H. Altmıs¸, I. Düzgün, B. Elbasan immediate effects of mulligan’s concept mobilization with movement on knee pain and functions in patients with knee osteoarthritis 31. Ravi Kumar Gupta, Anand Heggannavar Quantitative Effects Of Proprioceptive Exercises And Mulligan’s Mwm In Subjects With Osteoarthritis Knee-A Randomized Controlled Trial 32. Sonya Arshad, Dr. Syed Hasan Abbas Rizvi & Muhammad Nisar, To Evaluate the Effectiveness of Maitland Technique in Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis in Female Patients. June 2017. 33. Ramya V. Rao, Ganesh Balthillaya, Anupama prabhu, Asha Kamath, 2017. Immediate effects of Maitland mobilization versus Mulligan Mobilization with movement in osteoarthritis Knee-A Randomized Crossover Trial.