Volume : 9, Issue : 3, MAR 2023

DRA ANNUAL NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH, EDUCATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: OPPORTUNITIES & CHALLENGES

INTRODUCTION OF TRACHEOPHYTA

NITIN JAISWAL, PROF. RUP NARAYAN

Abstract

Tracheophyta, commonly known as tracheophytes, is the name given to the vascular plants, which constitute a monophyletic subclass of land plants. the main tracheophyte lineages (many groups excluded). Any plant, usually terrestrial, with fully established conducting tissue is referred to as a tracheophyte. The Greek words trakhys, which means "rough, unequal," gave rise to the terms trachea, which means "duct," and phyton, which means "plant."

Keywords

-

Article : Download PDF

Cite This Article

-

Article No : 62

Number of Downloads : 788

References

  1. Cantino, P.D. & de Queiroz, K. 2006. PhyloCode: a Phylogenetic Code of Biological Nomenclature. Version 3a. Website: http://www.phylocode.org. Revised June 16,2006.
  2. De Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39: 307-322.
  3. Simpson, G.C., 1961, Principles of animal taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.
  4. De Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. 1992.Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 449-480.
  5. Henning W., 1965, “Phylogenetic systmetics”, Annual Review of Entomology, 10, 97-116.
  6. Henning W., 1965, “Phylogenetic systmetics”, University of Illinois, Urbana.
  7. Eldredge, N. and J. Cracraft, 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.
  8. Wiley, E.O. 1981a, Phylogenetics, The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, John Wiley and sons, New York.
  9. Ax,P., 1987, The phylogenetic System. The systematization of organisms on the basis of their phylogenesis, John Wiley, Chichester.
  10. De Queiroz, K. & Gauthier, J. 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 27-31.
  11. De Queiroz K.Phylogenetic definitions and taxonomic philosophy,  Philos, 1992, vol. 7(pg. 295-313).
  12. De Queiroz K. Replacement of an essentialistic perspective on taxonomic definitions as exemplified by the definition of “Mammalia”,  Biol., 1994, vol. 43 (pg. 497-510).
  13. Darwin C., On the origin of species, 1859 London John Murray.
  14. Mishler B.D. 2010. Species are not uniquely real biological entities. In: Ayala F.J., Arp R., editors. Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. Malden (MA): Wiley-Blackwell. p. 110–122.
  15. Ereshefsky M. 2010. Darwin’s solution to the species problem. Synthese. 175:405–425.
  16. deQueiroz K.. Howard D. J., Berlocher S. H.. The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: A conceptual unification and terminological recommendations, Endless forms: Species and speciation, 1998 New York Oxford University Press (pg. 57- 75).
  17. deQueiroz K..  A.. The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category, Species: New interdisciplinary essays, 1999Cambridge, MassachusettsThe MIT Press(pg. 49-89).
  18. deQueiroz K.. Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species,  Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2005a, vol. 102(pg. 6600-6607).
  19. . A unified concept of species and its consequences for the future of taxonomy, Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., 2005b, vol. 56(pg. 196-215) (Suppl. 1).
  20. deQueiroz K.. Different species problems and their resolution, BioEssays, 2005c, vol. 27 (pg. 1263-1269).
  21. Lee M.,  Wolsan M.. Integration, individuality and species concepts, Biol. Philos., 2002, vol. 17 (pg. 651-660).
  22. Mishler B. D..  A.. Getting rid of species?, Species: New interdisciplinary essays, 1999 Cambridge, Massachusetts The MIT Press (pg. 307-315).
  23. Mishler B. D.. The advantages of rank-free classification for teaching and research, Cladistics, 2003, vol. 19 157.  
  24. . Phylogeny and classification of Hesionidae (Polychaeta), Zool. Scr., 1998, vol. 27 (pg. 89-163).
  25. . Phylogenetic taxonomy, a farewell to species, and a revision of Heteropodarke(Hesionidae, Polychaeta, Annelida), Syst. Biol., 1999, vol. 48  (pg. 755-789).
  26. . Revision of AmphidurosHartman, 1959 (Polychaeta, Hesionidae,Gyptini), Ophelia, 2001, vol. 54 (pg. 15-27).
  27. Lee M.,  Wolsan M.. Integration, individuality and species concepts,  Philos., 2002, vol. 17(pg. 651-660).
  28. Fisher K. M.,  Mishler B. D.. Laurin M.. Monography and the PhyloCode: A practical example from the moss clade , 2004 Abstracts, First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting, Paris, Muséum National d'HistoireNaturelle Paris Muséum National d'HistoireNaturellepg. 12.
  29. Laurin M.. Minelli A., Ortalli G., Sanga G.. The advantages of Phylogenetic Nomenclature over Linnean Nomenclature, Animal names, 2005 LettereedArti, Venice Istituto Veneto di Scienze(pg. 67-97).
  30. [11] "Xylem and Phloem". Basic Biology. 26 August 2020.
  31. Cavalier-Smith, Thomas(1998), "A revised six-kingdom system of life" (PDF), Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 73 (3): 203–266, doi:1111/j.1469-185X.1998.tb00030.x, PMID 9809012, S2CID 6557779, archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-03-29
  32. De Queiroz, K. &Cantino, P.D. 2001. Phylogenetic nomenclature and the PhyloCode. Bull. Zool. Nomencl. 58: 254-271.
  33. Lee, M.S.Y. 1998. Phylogenetic uncertainty, molecular sequences, and the definition oftaxon names. Syst. BioI. 47: 719-726.
  34. Sereno, P.C. 2005. The logical basis of phylogenetic taxonomy. Syst. BioI. 54: 595-619.
  35. Jefferies, R.P.S. 1979. The origin of chordates: a methodological essay. Pp. 443-477 in: House, M.R. (ed.), The Origin of Major Invertebrate Groups. Academic Press, London.
  36. Hermsen, E.J., Taylor, T.N., Taylor, E.L. & Stevenson, D.W. 2006. Cataphylls ofthe Middle Triassic cycad Antarcticycas. Amer. J. Bot. 93: 724-738.
  37. Wyss, A.R. &Meng, J. 1996. Application of phylogenetic taxonomy to poorly resolved crown clades: a stem-modified node-based definition of Rodentia. Syst. BioI. 45: 559-568.
  38. Sinnott, E.W. 1935.Botany: Principles and Problems, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  39. Cavalier-Smith, T. 1998.A revised six-kingdom system oflife. BioI. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 73: 203-266.
  40. Cox, C.J., Goffinet, B., Shaw, A.J. & Boles, S.B. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships among the mosses based on heterogeneous Bayesian analysis ofmultiple genes from multiple genomic compartments. Syst. Bot. 29: 234-250.
  41. He-Nygren, X., Ahonen, I., Juslen, A., Glenny, D. &Piippo, S. 2004. Phylogeny of liverworts-beyond a leaf and a thallus. Pp. 87-118 in: Goffinet, B.,Hollowell,V.& Magill, R. (eds.),Molecular Systematics of Bryophytes. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.
  42. Davis, J.I, Stevenson, D.W.,Petersen, G., Seberg, 0., Campbell, L.M., Freudenstein, J.V., Goldman, D.H., Hardy, C.R., Michelangeli, F.A., Simmons, M.P., Specht, C.D., Vergara-Silva, F. & Gandolfo, M. 2004. A phylogeny of the monocots, as inferred from rbcL and atpA sequence variation, and a comparison of methods for calculating jackknife and bootstrap values. Syst. Bot. 29: 467-510.
  43. Duff, R.J., Cargill, D.C., Villarreal, J.C. &Renzaglia, K.S. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of the hornworts based on rbcL sequence data: novel relationships and new insights. Pp. 41-58 in: Goffinet, B., Hollowell, V. & Magill, R. (eds.),Molecular Systematics ofBryophytes. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.
  44. Nickrent, D.L., Parkinson, C.L., Palmer, J.D. & Duff, R.J. 2000. Multigene phylogeny ofland plants with special reference to bryophytes and the earliest land plants. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 17: 1885-1895.
  45. Delwiche, C.F., Andersen, R.A., Bhattacharya, D., Mishler, B.D. & McCourt, R.M. 2004. Algal evolution and the early radiation of green plants. Pp. 121-137 in: Cracraft, J. & Donoghue, M.l (eds.), Assembling the Tree of Life. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
  46. Kelch, D.G., Driskell, A. &Mishler, B.D. 2004. Inferring phylogeny using genomic characters: a case study using land plant plastomes. Pp. 3-11 in: Goffinet, B., Hollowell, V. & Magill, R. (eds.), Molecular Systematics of Bryophytes. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.
  47. Kenrick, P. & Crane, P.R. 1997.The Origin and Early Diversification of Land Plants-A Cladistic Study. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  48. Jeffrey, C. 1982.Kingdoms, codes and classification. Kew Bull. 37: 403-416.
  49. Bremer, K. 1985. Summary of green plant phylogeny and classification. Cladistics 1: 369-385.
  50. Haupt, A.W. 1953. Plant Morphology. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  51. Qiu, Y.-L., Li, L., Wang, B., Chen, Z., Knoop, V., GrothMalonek, M., Dombrovska, 0., Lee, J., Kent, L., Rest, J., Estabrook, G.F., Hendry, T.A., Taylor, D.W., Testa, C.M., Ambros, M., Crandall-Stotler, B., Duff, R.J., Stech, M., Frey, W., Quandt, D. & Davis, C.C. 2006b. The deepest divergences in land plants inferred from phylogenomic evidence. Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103: 15511-15516.