Onuoha, C.A. Dyer-Regis, B. & Onuoha, P.C.


Background: The Caribbean Island nations introduced a school health programme aimed to equipping the youths with life skills to enable them cope better in the society since the 1990s. In Trinidad and Tobago, teachers were trained to deliver this programme to their students in both primary and secondary schools. The implementation of the programme is at best haphazard. This study is an attempt to document the views of the teachers about the training they received pertaining to this programme. Methods: Teachers who have been trained in this programme were purposively selected to document their views through a focus group sessions. Two sets of this group sessions were undertaken with 11 teachers. Their views were reported verbatim and analyzed using Colaizzi’s analysis technique. Result: Caribbean Teachers gave their perspectives about their training. Importantly, their views were summarizes in two themes, namely, different training techniques, and concerns. Discussions; Given the mixed result, it is important to ensure that the teachers who are the implementers of the programme receive adequate training so that they will be in a better position to impact on the skills of the youth as envisage by the programme designers. The implications of the findings were discussed vis-à-vis the literature. Conclusion: This study identified some of the good elements of the training the teachers’ were exposed to. It also highlighted some areas that require re-visiting if this laudable programme will yield its maximum fruit.


Teachers, school health programme, Caribbean

Full Text:



Ministry of Education (MOE), Trinidad and Tobago. The New Primary HFLE

Curriculum. Retrieved from on 22nd January, 2015

UNICEF. Health and Family Life Education Regional Curriculum Framework Ages 11

to 16. Version 2.1 (2010). Bridgetown: UNICEF. Retrieved from

www.UNICEF_HFLE_Ages_5- _16.pdf-Adobe Reader

Onuoha, C.A.; Dyer-Regis, B.; Onuoha, P.c.; Jameson-Charles, M.; & Herbert, S.

Exploring the roles of curriculum workload and Belief Systems in the implementation of a school Health Programme of a Caribbean Island. International Journal of Education and Research. 2017. Vol 5 (2) pp. 151 – 160

Naidoo, J. & Wills, J. Foundations for Health Promotion: 2011 (3rd ed.). China: Elsevier.

Rampersad, J. Inside the CARICOM Multi-Agency Health and Family Life Education

(HFLE) Project: A Post structural Analysis of Policy & Practice.2008 Ph.D. Thesis submitted at the University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago, St. Augustine.

Patton, J. W.; Graczyk, P.A.; Wardlaw, D. M.; Bloodworth, M.; Tompsett, C. J.; & Weissberg,

R.P. Social & Emotional Learning: a framework for quality school-based prevention Programs. Journal of School Health, 2000: 70, PP 179 – 185.

Berman, P.; & MacLaughlin, M. W. Implementation of Educational Innovation. The

Educational Forum, 1976: 40 PP. 345 – 370.

Dusenbury, L.; Brannigan, R.; Falco, M.; & Hansen, W.B. A Review of Research on

Fidelity of Implementation: implications for drug abuse and prevention in school settings.

Health Education Res. 2003: 18 (2), PP. 237 – 256. DOI: Retrieved from

Hennessey, A. & Dionigi, R. Implementing Cooperative Learning in Australian

Primary Schools: 2013: Generalist Teachers’ Perspectives. Retrieved from

Almulla, M. An Investigation of Saudi Teachers’ Perceptions towards Training in

Cooperative Learning. International Journal of Social Sciences; 2016: 2 (1) PP. 715 - 737

Sheldon, S. In Farrell, J.W.; Oliveira, J.B.; Brown, S.L.; Etienne, B. (Ed.). Teachers

in Developing Countries: Improving Effectiveness and Managing Costs. Washington DC: The Worldbank. Retrieved from 1993: PP. 187 – 200

Miskeljin, L. & Arsenijevic, J. (2014). Quality of Teaching: Teachers’ and Students’

Perspectives. Retrieved from

Pickett, K.; Rietdjik, W.; Byrne, J. & Grace, M. Teaching Health Education: a

ThematicAnalysis of early career teachers’ experience following pre-service health training.2017: Retrieved from

Basen-Enquist, K.; O’Hara-Tompskins, N.; Lovato, C.Y.; Lewis, M.J.; Parcel, G.S.; &

Gingiss, P. The effect of two types of teacher training on implementation of smart choices: a tobacco prevention curriculum. Journal of School Health, 1994: 64, PP 334 – 339.

Dewhirst, S. & Byme, J.Raising the profile of health and well-being education in

teacher training: the challenges and successes of introducing a skills-based health day for pre-service teachers at the University of Southampton. International Journal of Health

Promotion and Education. 2014: Vol. 52 (5) PP 260 -270.

Byme, J.; Pickett, K.; Rietdik, W.; & Roderick, P. A longitudinal study to explore the

impact of pre-service teacher health training on early career teachers roles as health

promoters. 2016: Retrived from

Drake, G., Graham, C., Fuller, M., & Jerkins, B. Health and Family Life Education

Regional Curriculum Framework for Ages 11years to 16 years. 2009: Version 2.1. retrieved from

Bethel, C. Feburary (8). Call for Health and Family Education in Schools. Trinidad

Express. 2011: Retrieved from

Guardian Newspaper. NGOs call for Sexual Education in Schools.

March 25: Retrieved from

Wayoro, S. Need for Health Life Education. Trinidad Express. 2014, June 6:

Retrieved from

Abramson, JH & Abramson, ZH. Individual-based analytic surveys. Survey Methods

in Community Medicine. Epidemiologic Research Programme Evaluation Clinical Trials. 1999: Churchill Livingstone.

Nigatn, T. Qualitative Data Analysis.2009: Retrieved from

Shosha, G.A. Employment of Colaizzi’s strategy in Descriptive Phenomenology: A

Reflection of a Research. 2012: Retrieved from www. Vol.8 (27).


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

International Educational Scientific Research Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Based on a work at


Disclaimer: Articles on International Educational Scientific Research Journal have been previewed and authenticated by the Authors before sending for the publication. The Journal, Chief Editor and the editorial board are not entitled or liable to either justify or responsible for inaccurate and misleading data if any. It is the sole responsibility of the Author concerned.